← Intelligence Feed
Financial Risk Comparison
🇷🇸 Serbia vs 🇯🇵 Japan
SIGMA Engine Systemic Risk Analysis · 2026
🇷🇸
Serbia
64.8
critical
Kairos 26.1d·CEE
🇯🇵
Japan
59.7
accumulation
Kairos 29.9d·APAC
SIGMA Verdict
Japan presents lower systemic risk at SIGMA 59.7 vs Serbia at 64.8 — a 5.1-point spread. Serbia's primary risk driver is Political Risk. The Kairos temporal window suggests Serbia has the more immediate risk horizon.
Risk Dimensions
🇷🇸 Serbia
🇯🇵 Japan
Sovereign/Fiscal← safer
62
85
Banking Stresssafer →
55
42
Currency Risksafer →
58
35
Political Risksafer →
65
28
Contagion Risk← safer
48
68
🇷🇸 Serbia
Biggest Risk
Political Risk
65/100
Strongest Shield
Contagion Risk
48/100
🇯🇵 Japan
Biggest Risk
Sovereign/Fiscal
85/100
Strongest Shield
Political Risk
28/100
Frequently Asked
Is Serbia safer than Japan for institutional investors?
Based on SIGMA Engine v5.0 analysis, Japan shows lower systemic risk at 59.7/100. However, risk profiles differ: Serbia has strongest exposure in Political Risk while Japan is most stressed in Sovereign/Fiscal.
What drives the SIGMA score difference between Serbia and Japan?
The 5.1-point SIGMA spread reflects divergent risk trajectories. Serbia's elevated regime is driven by Political Risk pressure at 65/100.
Related Comparisons
Full Serbia–Japan analysis: entity-level SIGMA, contagion paths, Phantom scenarios.
Daily brief · Kairos window · Early warning signals
Access Full Comparison →