← Intelligence Feed
Financial Risk Comparison
🇷🇴 Romania vs 🇯🇵 Japan
SIGMA Engine Systemic Risk Analysis · 2026
🇷🇴
Romania
76.2
critical
Kairos 14.5d·CEE
🇯🇵
Japan
59.7
accumulation
Kairos 29.9d·APAC
SIGMA Verdict
Japan presents lower systemic risk at SIGMA 59.7 vs Romania at 76.2 — a 16.5-point spread. Romania's primary risk driver is Sovereign/Fiscal. The Kairos temporal window suggests Romania has the more immediate risk horizon.
Risk Dimensions
🇷🇴 Romania
🇯🇵 Japan
Sovereign/Fiscal← safer
78
85
Banking Stresssafer →
60
42
Currency Risksafer →
55
35
Political Risksafer →
65
28
Contagion Risk← safer
55
68
🇷🇴 Romania
Biggest Risk
Sovereign/Fiscal
78/100
Strongest Shield
Currency Risk
55/100
🇯🇵 Japan
Biggest Risk
Sovereign/Fiscal
85/100
Strongest Shield
Political Risk
28/100
Frequently Asked
Is Romania safer than Japan for institutional investors?
Based on SIGMA Engine v5.0 analysis, Japan shows lower systemic risk at 59.7/100. However, risk profiles differ: Romania has strongest exposure in Sovereign/Fiscal while Japan is most stressed in Sovereign/Fiscal.
What drives the SIGMA score difference between Romania and Japan?
The 16.5-point SIGMA spread reflects divergent risk trajectories. Romania's elevated regime is driven by Sovereign/Fiscal pressure at 78/100.
Related Comparisons
Full Romania–Japan analysis: entity-level SIGMA, contagion paths, Phantom scenarios.
Daily brief · Kairos window · Early warning signals
Access Full Comparison →