← Intelligence Feed
Financial Risk Comparison
🇷🇸 Serbia vs 🇨🇳 China
SIGMA Engine Systemic Risk Analysis · 2026
🇷🇸
Serbia
51.7
accumulation
Kairos 29.8d·CEE
🇨🇳
China
54.8
accumulation
Kairos 30.2d·APAC
SIGMA Verdict
Serbia presents lower systemic risk at SIGMA 51.7 vs China at 54.8 — a 3.1-point spread. China's primary risk driver is Contagion Risk. The Kairos temporal window suggests Serbia has the more immediate risk horizon.
Risk Dimensions
🇷🇸 Serbia
🇨🇳 China
Sovereign/Fiscalsafer →
62
58
Banking Stress← safer
55
72
Currency Risksafer →
58
48
Political Risktied
65
65
Contagion Risk← safer
48
78
🇷🇸 Serbia
Biggest Risk
Political Risk
65/100
Strongest Shield
Contagion Risk
48/100
🇨🇳 China
Biggest Risk
Contagion Risk
78/100
Strongest Shield
Currency Risk
48/100
Frequently Asked
Is Serbia safer than China for institutional investors?
Based on SIGMA Engine v5.0 analysis, Serbia shows lower systemic risk at 51.7/100. However, risk profiles differ: Serbia has strongest exposure in Political Risk while China is most stressed in Contagion Risk.
What drives the SIGMA score difference between Serbia and China?
The 3.1-point SIGMA spread reflects divergent risk trajectories. China's elevated regime is driven by Contagion Risk pressure at 78/100.
Related Comparisons
Full Serbia–China analysis: entity-level SIGMA, contagion paths, Phantom scenarios.
Daily brief · Kairos window · Early warning signals
Access Full Comparison →