← Intelligence Feed
Financial Risk Comparison
🇨🇳 China vs 🇳🇱 Netherlands
SIGMA Engine Systemic Risk Analysis · 2026
🇨🇳
China
73.6
critical
Kairos 17.9d·APAC
🇳🇱
Netherlands
41.8
stable
Kairos 30.3d·EU
SIGMA Verdict
Netherlands presents lower systemic risk at SIGMA 41.8 vs China at 73.6 — a 31.8-point spread. China's primary risk driver is Contagion Risk. The Kairos temporal window suggests China has the more immediate risk horizon.
Risk Dimensions
🇨🇳 China
🇳🇱 Netherlands
Sovereign/Fiscalsafer →
58
38
Banking Stresssafer →
72
48
Currency Risksafer →
48
28
Political Risksafer →
65
30
Contagion Risksafer →
78
62
🇨🇳 China
Biggest Risk
Contagion Risk
78/100
Strongest Shield
Currency Risk
48/100
🇳🇱 Netherlands
Biggest Risk
Contagion Risk
62/100
Strongest Shield
Currency Risk
28/100
Frequently Asked
Is China safer than Netherlands for institutional investors?
Based on SIGMA Engine v5.0 analysis, Netherlands shows lower systemic risk at 41.8/100. However, risk profiles differ: China has strongest exposure in Contagion Risk while Netherlands is most stressed in Contagion Risk.
What drives the SIGMA score difference between China and Netherlands?
The 31.8-point SIGMA spread reflects divergent risk trajectories. China's elevated regime is driven by Contagion Risk pressure at 78/100.
Related Comparisons
Full China–Netherlands analysis: entity-level SIGMA, contagion paths, Phantom scenarios.
Daily brief · Kairos window · Early warning signals
Access Full Comparison →